@Background Pony #4C22
Hillary Clinton dismisses concerns about her health as conspiracy theories but when Dr. Drew “the most trusted doctor in America” expressed his concerns he was let go from CNN. A Huffington Post writer that wrote an article about it got his article deleted and he was fired. She has handlers that literally hold her up and she has to take breaks during debates. There are imprints of catheter bags on her pantsuit’s legs. Stains show her to be incontinent. She has not held a press conference this year. Quarter million dollar apparatuses are installed in the cars of her motorcade to help her. She needs a stool to get into a car.
@A Racist Zebra: You know that reports about Hillary’s “failing health” have been debunked. Right? Adding to that, she’s reportedly working on going all out on the orange clown during the debates. Said orange clown won’t stand a chance.
I feel bad for Canada, having to take in so many unpatriotic people when Trump becomes president of the United States of America.
I honestly doubt Hillary even being able to survive the debates, considering her rapidly failing health, to the point where she can’t walk properly without assistance.
@Ridley Wolf
By “tend to”, you must mean it’s a fifty-fifty chance. If i’m looking at the data right, half of immigrants to the US contribute to society. The rest are on state welfare for the rest of their lives.
@Background Pony #58DF
There’s no such thing as a perfect experiment other, but I can’t just pick the ones with results I like. Some sources are more or less biased than others, and some sources are more or less transparent than others in where they get their information and how they draw the conclusions they do. That last part is important because when sources disagree on something, I like to find out why.
@Background Pony #58DF
I see what you did there, posting only videos of leftists with mexican/soviet flags smashing windows.
Unfortunately it’s probably too clever for your target audience.
@Background Pony #4C22
Not only that! There have been so many examples of violent Drumpf supporters! They have no tolerance for anyone that disagrees with them! All they can do is chant racist one liner slogans whenever someone tries to rationally talk to them. Sick!
Take a look at the examples below, there is so much footage. I can’t begin to show you all of it. Imagine what wasn’t able to be recorded.
@AaronMk
Oh, I know. I’m never going to convince him. I’m just having fun. If I thought there was a snowball’s chance in hell of a useful outcome, I’d be putting in more effort and less shitposting, and I probably wouldn’t argue drunk.
As it stands though, besides amusement what is a political argument online supposed to accomplish? I’d run a link by to illustrate the point by re-reviewing it it appears even the people who published the article I was going to toss up learned that what they were reporting on (that no voters have ever been swayed by a Facebook post on politics) may not be nearly as sound as they would have liked, but kept it up for posterity and instead littered it with editor notes.
Still, all the same the anecdotal evidence is there and we come around to the point: is there going to be a point to debating this.
I can understand if ya’ll just doing this to flex some muscle, have some fun, or blow off some steam. But there’s most likely not going to be a definitive “win” on either side with one or the other admitting to the other their wrong and they’ll re-evaluate their political views.
@Background Pony #58DF
Except that it’s pretty widely acknowledged that Breitbart is pretty biased toward Trump. I mean hell, look who’s managing his campaign now. Even conservatives acknowledge that. Your “Center for Security Policy” also gets low marks from reputable news outlets, from the Southern Poverty Law Center, and from conservatives.
On the other side of things, Politifact seems to receive a lot of complaints from both sides, conveniently when it makes a decision that doesn’t go their way. That tells me that they must be doing something right. They also make it easy for readers to check their work if you don’t think they’re on the level.
@Vitruvius
Your source is left leaning and mine is right leaning. We have different beliefs of what is reality. Therefore the source one uses is bullshit to the other based on what we believe to be true.
