Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Fwelin on image #1230730

"[@DAPLR":](/1230730#comment_5347571
)  
It is, but said evidence is itself both second-hand and subject to word definition confusion. We've had similar statements (before the post you mentioned) that said that the events of the show are canon to the comics, but not vice versa, which makes you wonder if they reversed their stance, or if there's some kind of confusion of terms involved in this game of telephone.


 
It's basically implication vs suspect evidence. Until we either get a clear statement from an actual Hasbro executive with creative authority over all branches of the franchise or McCarthy herself, it will never be 100% clear.

"@DAPLR":/1230730#comment_5347571
It is, but said evidence is itself both second-hand and subject to word definition confusion. We've had similar statements (before the post you mentioned) that said that the events of the show are canon to the comics, but not vice versa, which makes you wonder if they reversed their stance, or if there's some kind of confusion of terms involved in this game of telephone.

It's basically implication vs suspect evidence. Until we either get a clear statement from an actual Hasbro executive with creative authority or McCarthy herself, it will never be 100% clear.

"@DAPLR":/1230730#comment_5347571
It is, but said evidence is itself both second-hand and subject to word definition confusion.

It's basically implication vs suspect evidence. Until we either get a clear statement from an actual Hasbro executive with creative authority or McCarthy herself, it will never be 100% clear.

"@DAPLR":/1230730#comment_5347571
It is, but said evidence is itself both second-hand and subject to word definition confusion.

It's basically implication vs suspect evidence. Until we either get a clear statement from an actual Hasbro executive or McCarthy herself, it will never be 100% clear.