The science behind rolling down the hill fast

Down bellow is that electrical engineering? Those kids are screwed

Alright, this is the way I see it. From left to right.
 
Carrot function of 🍎 equals the partial derivative of x with respect to snake, Ω prime and barrel to the power of x, so that Ω prime plus the partial derivative of x with respect to snake equals barrel to the power of x.
 
Down below, a flowchart that could be of the immune system. Or anything, really.
 
Then there’s a cake graph.
 
Up there, N times spiral divided by απ (α being an angle). Then a graph of something that looks like f(x)=[sin(x)]/x, with its local maxima and minima.
 
Down below, 6 times 🍎 and 8 snake divided by dot. Could be functions.
 
The graph of the right very well could be the solid of revolution of 6×🍎.
 
Finally, up there, xΦ divided by ω, all divided by infinity plus three. π equals the derivative of α. Then Δ minus a wave function × zigzag × heart. Then, Æ divided by x × compass plus the concentration of the 🌟 isotope of 🌙.
 
God dammit Cheerilee.

@kinghearts  
Don’t forget Psychology and Philosophy.

By Luna I can’t believe that this image i now used for discussing physics and math

@Cirrus Light  
I am glad that we can reached this point. And also I like you analogy too.

@CyanLightning  
Well, I agree well enough by this point. If you’re talking about learning the mathematics of relativity, then of course you need to know some things first, so a college graduate will learn much more easily than Scootaloo. But if you’re trying to teach an entirely new concept from scratch that doesn’t build on anything previous, then Scoots might actually learn better than any given adult.

@Background Pony #8911  
It’s prime symbol , not 1.

@Cirrus Light  
You know exchange sources all day seems a good idea. especially this going to make us learn a lot. unless if the debate some how turned into heated debate. and which we should stop at that point or just avoid it getting into that critical point.
 
Honestly from what i can search like this. https://www.futureschool.com/blog/adult-vs-child-learning/
 
It saying that Adult and children actually just learning differently. and yes for most of the aspect children can learn faster than Adult. But adult can learn a faster than Children if in under certain situation. like using their past memories for learning because all they need is just to make sense of the information by using past information while children need to learn that experience first. so yeah child learn faster for most of the part because all they need to do is just put the information into their brain. but because adult have a lot memories in their brain they need to organize it first before they can put another information. and again if some teacher took advantage of this past memories for learning. the adult can learn faster.
 
All i am saying is that the children can learn faster in most of situation. while adult in most of the situation can’t match with children. but when certain demands are meet they can learn as fast even faster than child can. and this is the reason why it is good idea to using the analogy to telling your friend an information.

@CyanLightning  
We could exchange sources all day, but it seems pretty consistent that children do have a number of advantages, especially in the more objectively written and scholarly sources.
 
@CyanLightning  

Saying why children learn better isn’t an argument that they don’t.
 
And the evolutionary reason for it is probably that children need to learn more at a younger age, then they go through “neural pruning” processes that cut unimportant information, leaving a brain with “important” information.
 
Evolutionarily, this allows humans to be very versatile and adaptable to a large range of situations - in a changing environment, each generation is better suited to survive the environment’s current nature than the last. Also, of course, babies need to learn basic motor functions in infancy, meaning that it’s necessary to learn a lot better at the younger ages than later.
 
You can learn always, of course, but it’s more important when younger, evolutionarily speaking, hence the brain is better suited to do it more while younger.
 
Now if you want to get all dumb and sensational with it, the takeaway isn’t that adults are bad at learning, it’s that children are very good at it. Sort of.

@Cirrus Light  
Also looking at how much calorie they burn is just like looking at CPU by how much Herz they have without looking at the Architecture that the CPU have. (but i don’t have a better analogy for that.)
 
Here sometime that can give you more contrast.
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationopinion/10315238/Are-children-really-better-at-foreign-language-learning.html

@Cirrus Light  
Yes the because they don’t have a lot of conflicting information in their brain like adult does have. also i still don’t really get it why we have twice the neurons in a child then we have in the adult why we cut the we are losing it. but again even in the elder age we still can make newer neuron connections while we are learning.

@CyanLightning  
That’s really awful.
 
But no, children really do learn better, a quick Google search brings up good sources.

@Cirrus Light  
Honestly it’s even more tragic in the Developing country Like the country that i currently living in which is Indonesia. the teacher in here love to come late to the class and hack even not come at all. also 80 percent of our learning is from our visual. and most of teacher here didn’t use the visual media effectively. and making the learning in the school aren’t that effective.
 
And Actually Children aren’t better than adult for learning. They are just different. Adult usually bring all of their experience in from their life to make sense what the information that they about to get while children isn’t really have that much experience as an adult so they tend to accept everything they got. so in some situation an adult can be come much faster learner than a children like in the in the subject that they already enthusing. while children can learn faster in general thing. But adult are alot faster in specific thing. so teaching an adult in they way of teaching the children isn’t going be a good idea.

@SomeponyElsesProblem  
Indeed. Although physics is fundamentally qualitative, you must have quantitative understanding to really use it or build on it.
 
It’s also freaking amazing to see how reality adheres to these logical rules of mathematics. It’s weird that it actually works - all this moving letters and numbers around equal signs according to certain rules, sorting them around in matrices, taking derivatives and integrals by certain rules…
 
 
Also, children are better at learning than adults are. It’s tragic how little our system takes advantage of that, and instead slows everyone down to the slowest person. Instead of natural progression, everyone is held back to the level of the weakest link… So much untapped potential and wasted years.

@kinghearts
 
You can never start too early. Although I’d be pushing to learn all the advanced math, first. You get so much more out of physics with calculus.

@Background Pony #A59E  
That was my thought, but it could also just be conic sections. Those are more basic, and include parabolas, which are the geometric form of a lot of physics equations - anywhere there’s constant acceleration, for one.
 
Light cones are pretty awesome, though.
 
What I want to know is what that heart at the top-right means. In a world with magic study, is love a quantifiable thing?
 
…This makes me really sad our world isn’t this way.
 
Dear God, we’ve been waiting a long time for the magic patch. Please release.
 

 
@kinghearts  
It’s fine if it’s basic enough. Like Bill Nye’s videos. There’s even really fun stuff with pipe insulation and marbles - I was in a summer camp once where we made roller coaster tracks with pipe insulation and let marbles down them.
 
It was the funnest thing ever, and it even taught some fundamentals through hands-on stuff. We learned, for one, that the amount of energy you get is proportional to the height, and that you can’t go higher than you started.
 
Math is a powerful tool, but at its core, physics is really qualitative.
 
You could show pressure by poking holes in a cup of water near the top, or near the bottom.
 
You could show sound with a bowl of water and a musical instrument, maybe. Oooh, I want to try that now, lol.

In which grade are those kids??? to be learning physics already…geez

@Background Pony #A59E  
Next week they’re covering quantum entanglement so they can be ready for the bake sale  
It really is the only way to make a watched pot boil.

Light cones. Because visually displaying how an object moves in 4 dimensional space-time is an essential part of the go cart making process.
 
Next week they’re covering quantum entanglement so they can be ready for the bake sale.

Reminds me of a Drake and Josh episode, in which Josh tries to “challenge” the elementary school kids with challenging college problems

@Background Pony #8911  
I believe that’s (alpha)’ rather than (alpha)^1, wich would mean that (alpha)’= d(alpha)/dx, with alpha as a function of x.  
Still doesn’t make sense to me tho

@RainbowDash69  
Thanks a lot.

pi equals alpha to the power of one
 
lol ok

Man the curriculum is fast in Equestria!  
They teach the real shit to young fillies.