Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40c27/40c2709d535e676313072ddf18f88887d50dd196" alt="Ministry of Image - Fanfiction Printing"
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
I’m going to hell. :P
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Also, I think this is the only time that I’ve seen a mouthpiece be used for a character to say something that the canon character would actually say.
Seriously, I can see Pinkie actually saying that. (Probably not on its own; it needs more words)
If I hide the tag explicit I never want to see anything explicit anymore on this site. That includes comments and of course descriptions. That’s why there’s rule#7.
Usually we allow it if it’s spoilerd. A warning is always nice too.
example:
explicit <- warning, explicit.
Of course the moderators always have the last word on this. But normally it’s ok to do it like that.
But let me also add that the description is not meant to be a gallery of (unrelated) pictures. It’s only meant to describe the main picture.
Okay, just had a refresher on the rules (especially rule number #7), and I hit the point about spoilering an image. I understand that it’s for the user comments, but what about the picture description? If the images are spoilered would it be alright, and if so, what about tagging? I don’t really plan on providing too many repeat examples of this case, but i figured to ask anyway just for future reference. Also thanks in advance to those willing to put up with me for messing up like this.
What do you think happened to them?
And about the tag.. yeah, i missed that one. Should have deleted it too.
I reported it to the mods, you not allowed to put grimdark images in the description of a safe rated image, and the rating tag is based off the post, not the description.
So a mod removed the images from the description.
exactly.