Been reading this Blog, they ain’t even trying to be neutral on this.

Alright then, I’ll explain. When it comes to the hidden evil influences of a particular new media, the standard response people have is “Haha, yeah right, what kind of idiot believes that?”, with a few people going “Well obviously, who’s dumb enough to think joking about rape wouldn’t make people think rape is a joke?”. The only people who might have no pre-decided opinion on the matter are people who really care about things like studies or facts first.
 
Who quickly find out that there are none. And go back to “Haha, yeah right, what kind of idiot believes that without any proof whatsoever?”
 
In other words, there’s no undecideds. The only people who wants to have a debate are the people who’ve already taken up a position, but want to try convince other people to their side. If they were actually interested in factual debating, they would already know there’s nothing to debate.
 
It’s like the abortion debate. Except there, the people without a pre-decided opinion get the hell out of dodge because all Science says is “Lol I dunno, go ask Religion”.

@Deserter  
@optimistic_cynic
 
you guys should reconsider about that, the blog is pretty much neutral on things, and has some good articles too.
 
@DurgaHurga  
@Sorait  
‘for lack of a better term’ i guess
 
”-instead of actualy debating the topic at hand”  
i guess they are talking about the posibility of how this could be a learning experience for some people.  
…instead of more drama shit.

@Great And Powerful Trixie
 
Thats easy, as long as you dont shout how JJ is supporting rape your a rape apologist. That applies to anyone not.

“Many people [are] wasting their time making jokes. Instead of actually debating about the topic at hand which is rape.”
 
Hey guys, I’d like to submit the notion that rape is bad. Does anyone disagree? No? Great, debate over! Good thing we had this conversation instead of making jokes, right? God, humour is the worst!
 
(Can you guess which side the poster is on?)

@picklebrain  
How many years have you spent waiting for things you have to look for?

if you care about this shit either way you need to reevaluate your life

I’m a furry, And I’m against this

@SocDev  
“NO U” is not a creative response.

@semerl
 
I could say the same about you.

@Sorait  
“n 1997, the United States Supreme Court stated that the Internet is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution which means that your right to freedom of speech applies while online. “  
http://www.askthejudge.info/is-the-internet-protected-by-the-first-amendment/

@SocDev  
You’re not absolutely creative, are you?

Just two more images to the “drama” tag.

I watched a video about how feminism is first world problems the ideology.
 
It is basically just as true for this drama in many specific ways

@semerl
 
Without the right of expression, you wouldn’t be able to say that.

@SocDev  
I read somewhere that trolls aren’t taken seriously.

@Sorait  
Then why are we still talking?

@Sorait
 
Your saying laws dont apply to the internet? YOU RAPE APOLOGIST!
 
Whats next, claiming that men can also be raped?

… All I want is this to all end. And the SJWs SILENCED!

@semerl  
Yes we would, after all, this is the internet and the Constitution, as well as all the other various countries’ equivalents, does not apply to the internet

@Sorait  
Real Funny.

“Rape is bad. Stop fictional rape”
 
“Why bother trying to end fictional rape when there’s real rape to stop?”
 
“NICE JOB TRYING TO REDIRECT THE CONVERSATION YOU FICTION RAPER”

“Debates”  
Sure if you’d call a bunch of idiots throwing endless amounts of insults at each other a debate, then I guess a debate is what it is

@DurgaHurga
 
How should i call it then? I am serious, i mean… what is this then?

@Mart  
Oh, 1 thing before I’m off, this is like Yamino all over again.