Uploaded by deactivated549cfd
1280x1132 JPG 202 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH suggestive197196 +-SH artist:cuddlehooves341 +-SH oc998421 +-SH oc only730961 +-SH oc:leon windsong19 +-SH pegasus536820 +-SH pony1700588 +-SH baby powder295 +-SH baby wipes137 +-SH blushing295636 +-SH changing mat144 +-SH colt23196 +-SH diaper17587 +-SH diaper change620 +-SH diaper fetish11733 +-SH fetish60929 +-SH male585981 +-SH non-baby in diaper13098 +-SH pacifier3493 +-SH poofy diaper5813 +-SH solo1505874 +-SH watermark25656
Loading...
Loading...
It still confuses the heck out of me that you still haven’t added [diaper] to your hidden tags list.
It still confuses the heck out of me that you still haven’t added [diaper] to your hidden tags list.
I’ve taken to asking artists whose art I particularly like to send me the raw .pngs (or even the working copy when I can swing it). Sometimes they get posted here to replace the old versions, when I feel like putting in the effort.
But… using the jpeg compression algorithm then saving the resulting image as a png won’t actually make it smaller. It will probably make the file even larger in most cases.
FurAffinity are silly.
I typically dislike diaper anything (No offense to the people who like it, just not my thing) but god damn this is adorable.
No, FA compresses .pngs that exceed a certain filesize. It’s stupid, yes.
The only conclusion is that the artist themselves saved the image in jpeg format, then re-saved that copy as a png image. There is one other png image by the same artist here, but that one doesn’t have the same errors.
I hope the artist at least kept a copy of the image in its original format, since this is a very nice bit of art (watermark aside).