@Mikey
Thank you, this means a lot to me.😊

@Background Pony #0E92
Doesn’t look like AI to me. Also as the other BP said AI detectors are not a good thing to rely on for accuracy and I would not trust them.

@Ra1n
Your art is absolutely beautiful and better than a lot of what I’ve seen.

@Thomas Jetfire
Being trained on*
Do not give them the credit of doing anything on their own

Maybe it looks like an ai generated because it’s the style those AIs are studying

@Background Pony #0E92
Understood, I’m prepared to try again, and once again, thank you for your feedback.🙂🙂

@Background Pony #0E92
“AI image detectors” are a meme

(https://tantabus.ai/images/34864)

>>10

>>5080

Just another scam for rubes to fall for, like Cara (and glaze/nightshade)

@Ra1n
As a self taught artist familiar with many of your reasons myself I remain unconvinced. I’d like to see more from you before I decide whether or not to change my mind. If this is real, it is certainly some impressive stuff!
It also appears that my sentiment is shared, as someone added an AI content tag here.
Time will tell.

Ai image detectors seem to agree with me on this.

@Background Pony #0E92
I apologize for the issues you’ve noticed. To be honest, most of the problems you’ve mentioned are indeed due to my lack of skill. I’ll try to address each of your concerns:
1 and 4 are, regretfully, due to my insufficient painting skills. The reason there are parts that seem advanced is probably because of self-learning, which has led to some details being too difficult for me to render properly, while others fall within my comfort zone, resulting in inconsistencies. Regarding the eyebrows, I wasn’t aware of the specific issue, and I hope for your guidance on this.
As for the hair under the ear, I referenced Princess Celestia from an animation, but I’m uncertain where the problem lies with that. I’ll also mention other potential issues with the details, such as the integration of the character with the background. Since the background and the character were painted separately, and the quality was compressed during multiple revisions (a personal mistake), there may be flaws where the character meets the background. Additionally, my poor painting skills might make the hair appear a bit messy, and I admit to being lazy with color selection.
The time span for creating this piece was quite long, and it was not worked on continuously, which led to conflicting ideas from one session to the next. Overall,this piece is somewhat like a fortunate find among my own works, being one of the better ones，i was also hesitant about uploading this work, and I have reviewed it within my limited knowledge multiple times. I will learn from the issues you’ve pointed out and attempt to make corrections. I hope more problems can be identified to help me improve. As I’ve said, as a self-learning artist, my abilities are uneven, and I currently don’t have the skill to render some of the issues better. Please understand. 😥😥😥

I don’t trust this. It’s the first work of said artist posted on their profile and there are so many inconsistencies and baffling decisions on the details that it feels like an AI paintover. Apologies to the author if this is legit but it doesn’t feel like it.
My issues:
-Zoom in on the horn
-The difference between the left side of the eyelashes vs the right
-Hair right under the ear
-Advanced perspective in some areas, amateur mistakes in others like the neckpiece

Another Chinese painter, damn, they’re good at it. Russians are lagging behind.

So pretty~

Great, whether it’s color selection or composition. I am curious about what style this is. Although there is no line, it not only does not affect the picture, but even makes it very soft.

Nice and pretty

Dang that’s pretty.

author:https://t.bilibili.com/1013398031755640867?share_source=pc_native