Uploaded by Chopsticks 
1280x1785 JPG 254 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Direct follow-up from the previous.
le gasp
Could there be an actual, consistent flow of events for once?
Part 2:
le gasp
Could there be an actual, consistent flow of events for once?
Part 2:
Tags
+-SH safe2272578 +-SH artist:chopsticks780 +-SH pinkie pie266347 +-SH oc1001306 +-SH oc:chopsticks281 +-SH earth pony547987 +-SH pegasus539079 +-SH pony1705581 +-SH comic:wtb is this?84 +-SH g42131240 +-SH canon x oc36889 +-SH cheek fluff10887 +-SH chest fluff72888 +-SH comic140894 +-SH dialogue100587 +-SH fangs44127 +-SH female1914802 +-SH flapping966 +-SH hat133868 +-SH hoof fluff3642 +-SH male587791 +-SH mare809713 +-SH monochrome180748 +-SH pinkamena diane pie23307 +-SH stallion212402 +-SH stuttering236 +-SH sweat44281 +-SH text97176 +-SH unshorn fetlocks53606
Loading...
Loading...
And he’s gotten so proficient as to work it around his own mother.
Edited
You have no idea what stockholm syndrome is, do you? And again, look for images from this series that shows that Chopsticks enjoys this before claiming he does, because I have no reason to think otherwise as it stands now.
Which might well be the case, but unless the victim is willing to complain, or someone else alleges a charge of kidnapping, there’s not much to be done. It’s easy to look at someone’s life and shake your head, saying: That’s terrible. But some people are happy despite being in what we think of as and abusive relationship.
Basically, if he’s happy, and she’s happy… there’s no real harm being done that couldn’t be undone with therapy and painkillers.
And we are the outside observers, and unless you can show proof otherwise, it’s pretty much a case of stockholm syndrome.
Then only an outside observation could tell.
What if the only reason they consent is because they have been heavily psychologically manipulated into doing so?
True, I just said it’s about consent. If it’s happening to a man or woman who doesn’t consent, it’s abuse. If there is consent, it’s just Sadomasochistic behavior.
No she does not love him, psychopaths are neurologically incapable of love or emotional attachment. the only thing he could ever be to her is a useful tool. You need to stop anthropomorphizing these creatures. Psychopaths are not mentally human, they are devoid of humanity in even the slightest sense. they’re more akin to sentient biological machines than they are humans. My point is, stop thinking of the psychopath as if it were a human with feelings, it doesn’t have any, it only cares about itself.
Edited
And seeing as the only reason he put up with the abuse is because he’s under the belief that Pinkamena loves him, something that she can’t bring herself to say, indicating that she doesn’t love him, and knows that if she did say it, than she would be without a victim. And show me one time that Chopsticks has shown to enjoy the pain and not just being a victim of stockholm syndrome.
And you never argued against my point of gender playing a role in you guys defending Pinkamena’s actions.
It’s all about consent. If being beat up is what you’re into… who are we to say that’s wrong?
Someone being cold to strangers (what a tsundere is) is very different from an abuser (the perverted interpretation of tsundere). If the sexes were reversed, I doubt people would be defending Pinkamena here.
Why? Why would an girl who likes to show her affection through violence struggle with three little words?
Why do you think, Baka?
Actually, there is love.
Very likely.
@Background Pony #394F
If that was the case, than why would she need to deny loving him? It’s more likely that he’s just gullible and thinks her abuse is love.
There is no love here
It’s clear she’s a sadist. But it’s also clear he’s a mascocist. Like I said, love can be a little twisted.
Or she’s afraid of the possibility of him seeing through her lies, even if that is very unlikely
yes, so she can easily deceive him by saying something like “yes, I love you dearly.” then when she abuses him, he’ll still think it means love, even if people try to help him. the only reason she would hesitate is if she cares about deceiving him.
Ever heard of stockholm syndrome? It’s one reason abuse victims are less likely to report their abuse since it’s normalized to them. He’s asking her since to him, abuse it love, and learning that it isn’t would make him realized that she never loved him and only saw him as a punching bag. Literally in this case.
your current filter.if her torturing him was enough proof, then he wouldn’t be asking her if it was true or not. saying “I love you” is easy. saying it when you are worried about someone else is not.
I think the amount of images of her beating him up and torturing him is more than enough proof, unless you think that physical abuse is a form of love, than you may need more help than I can offer.
how would she ever get caught in the lie? there’s no way to prove she doesn’t love him.
Again, I’m pretty sure she just doesn’t want to get caught in the lie.