Oh dear god you people and how you think you got fucking history decrees. XD

@HamburgerTime: Its… a little more complicated then that. The Werhmacht certainly wasn’t the “squeaky-clean, no atrocities here” army that its Generals, and a number of other Western historians, portrayed it after the war. But on the other hand, the portrait of them as unabashadly evil is just as incorrect.
 
While I have no doubt there were far more then a few Nazi true believers in their ranks, from my reading of the times it appears to me that most German soldiers, whether Werhmacht or SS, fought for Germany and not for Nazism just as so many Soviets fought for Russia and not for Stalinist Communism.
 
However, your average WW2 German soldier’s view of what Germany is had certainly been colored by the Nazi society many of them spent their childhood and teenage years in. Therefore, it can be said that they were fighting for Germany, but the idea of the Germany they were fighting for did have a touch of Nazi ideology in it.
 
To be fair, this is hardly unique even for World War 2: many Japanese and Soviet soldiers fell into the same psychological trap, although not to them same extent the Germans did.

@Hamburger  
Are you broken?

@Background Pony  
If you were fighting for Germany during World War Two, you can very well be considered a Nazi. Fighting for them and being one of them aren’t so different.

I do nazi any swastikas.

WE ARE THE PONY ELITE  
BORN TO COMPETE  
NEVER RETREAT  
HORSE DIVISION

It is I, Pinkie, and the Pony Squadron!

no, because it isn’t. there isn’t any indication of nazi symbol. also the reference was taken from a regular wehrmacht commander, no need to lable all germans nazi.

Can you at least tag this stuff with the nazi tag?