I figure Gamer Luna is just an exaggeration of “how many points do I receive?” Luna anyway, so this wouldn’t bother me in the slightest even though I’m normally against fanon pandering.
@Itsthinking
Like I said, good intentions, completely messed up reading of the demographics.
@Background Pony
I will only reply with one thing, and that is that just behind Woona, Gamer Luna is the second most popular interpretation of the Princess.
@sigh
From what I got, they wanted to make it to compete to begin with and took the massive amount of humanizations created as a hint that it would be well received in the periphery demographic.
@Dr Outback
Just because the execs at Hasbro are out of touch with what makes our fandom (and the little girl part of it) tick doesn’t mean the intent wasn’t there.
There should be an option for just “I don’t care for Gamer Luna”. The way it’s set up, it sounds like you have to approve of all fanon if you approve of any.
@Takashi.0
I can’t really say it has. The most significant one, Derpy, did affect the story, but only because it was part of the plot. The others just seem like cute (and appreciated) nods.
Fans bitch and moan all the time about practically non-existent “pandering” in the show, but when the comics do some sort of reference every other page nobody bats a goddamn eye.
@Django
Actually Magic Duel was written in 2011, before the show had the fandom it does now.
Equestria Girls, from what I know was made to compete with monster high, though Katie Cook did say the high amount of humanized art also had something to do with it. So interpret that one as you will.
I know it’s an unpopluar opinion, but what we have in the show doesn’t seem like pandering to me. Though Gamer Luna being put in. Oh yeah. That would be it all the way.
@Dr Outback
Actually you’ve got a good point, this reminds me of those Facebook posts where they say something completely uncontroversial then say “like if you love god” and “ignore if you love satan” and stuff like that.