"Poverty causes crime? According to James Q. Wilson and Richard Herrnstein, 'During the 1960s, one neighborhood in San Francisco had the lowest income, the highest unemployment rate, the highest proportion of families with incomes under four thousand dollars a year, the least educational attainment, the highest tuberculosis rate, and the highest proportion of substandard housing . . . That neighborhood was called Chinatown. Yet, in 1965, there were only five persons of Chines ancestry commited to prison in the entire [emphasis added] state of California."

"Roxbury, Massachusetts, a predominantly black and impoverished area, sits next to South Boston, a predominantly white and impoverished area. Both contain the same percentage of single parent households, and public housing accounts for the same percentage of the population. Yet, the violent crime rate in Roxbury, the black area, is four times the rate of that in South Boston. If poverty caused crime, one would expect the numbers to be closer to equal."

- Larry Elder, from 10 Things You Can't Say in America
*not_secure_link*armageddongames.net/showthread.php?89677-Poverty-causes-crime

------------

I have lived with poor Orientals and felt perfectly safe.

In China the per capita Gross Domestic Product is $8,400. In India it is $3,700. In the United States it is $48,100.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publica...ina&countryCode=ch&regionCode=eas&rank=119#ch

In China the murder rate per 100,000 inhabitants is 1.12. In India it is 3.4. In the United States it is 5.0

*not_secure_link*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

Blacks have a high crime rate wherever they live. Chinese have a low crime rate wherever they live, even if they are poor.

 

That is all going on that the cultural situation is the same. As if bad white people don't treat Asians different than blacks? I mean, look at the common stereotypes and other than black people being good at sports, what other "positives" do racists have to say? Asians on the other hand have numerous "positive" stereotypes.

The differences aren't racial, they are cultural, and it's completely arguable that white American has done everything possible to squash and bastardize black culture since slavery until even now.

Plus, if there is a genetic disposition toward more aggression, it's ridiculous to extrapolate that into something that deals with man made laws and crime rates. Society and culture have a larger impact on behavior than race(which can be argued that it doesn't even exist).

 

You are the perfect example of why and how our public schools are failing. You are a god damn idiot, and you will never know why.

*not_secure_link*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect

That might help you out, bud!

 

Your assumption seems to be that blacks commit lots of crimes because white racists expect it of them. Should they not be trying to correct those attitudes?

My assumption is that white racism does not cause black crime. Black crime causes white racism. It reinforces it generation after generation despite efforts by powerful groups to suppress its open expression.

There is usually some truth behind stereotypes. Even people who hate Orientals do not think they are stupid and lazy. Usually they resent the Orientals because the Orientals perform too well, and they cannot compete with them.

 

*not_secure_link*25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lw4193ntDG1qd28m6o1_500.gif
​

 

1961

 

See you are still spouting off insults and all I did was simply beg the question as to why DL is wrong when he is simply speaking the truth about something. How can he be racist if it is a FACT that blacks commit more violent crime. He's not just saying that will nilly because he hates black people, he's only pointing out what the statistics show. And yeah I'm an idiot all right, considering I deal with some of the most advanced technology in the world and I'm damn good at it.

 

hopefully the troops will be home soon

 

Homicide Trends In The U.S. Trends by race

Racial differences exist, with blacks disproportionately represented among homicide victims and offenders...

In 2005, offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites.
*not_secure_link*bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/race.cfm

 

Yeah nothing racist about that DL. Call DL a racist all you want guys but he can't be a god damn racist if he's stating a quantifiable undeniable fact.

like my earlier example if all white people like pepsi and its a proven fact that every single white person likes pepsi you can't be called a racist for saying that all white people like pepsi.

 

Again DL seems to be trying to compare the US fuck up in Vietnam with the current one in Afghan. The US in Vietnam spent more time fighting the NVA than the Vietmihn/cong.
In Afghanistan they are facing insurgents and not regular forces, these guys can shoot, walk around the corner and disappear, they can infiltrate the ANA and shoot NATO trainers. They can place remote detonated IEDs, they can use VBIEDs.

While you are training the ANA you are also training the insurgents on your tactics. How many of these brave ANA soldiers will keep the uniform once the NATO support as gone, how many of the police will stay incorruptible or alive after the draw-down.

The Taleban can and will slaughter any who do not switch sides, the level of violence will rise dramatically once the last NATO boot shakes the dust of that hell hole out of its tread. To think otherwise is to act like a naif.

No-one in history has managed to tame the Afghans, and this present operation will prove to be nothing more than a bright and shining lie told by the politicians to justify their actions.

All that NATO has achieved is provide a good training area and get a lot of soldiers and civilians killed. What the politicos have done is come close to destroying the moral and fighting spirit of their countries forces.

 

I do not call him a racist and bigot for providing facts, I do for is assertion that these figures are caused by an as of yet not found criminal gene and that their lack of intelligence is down to yet another gene, which is again as of now not found. He fails or refuses to take into consideration that environmental conditions are a major cause in crime and education, he will use a plethora of charts to back his claim but fails to see that in most African countries the average schooling in years is around 3-4 while in the use it is 15.

But he is not a racist because of his facts, just the fact that he fails to vector in any figures that will ruin his hypothesis.

His bigotry can be seen all over the Martin/Zimmerman threads and in this one phrase.

 

Once again you distort what I do believe, either intentionally in order to make it easier to refute, or because you are unable to understand it.

While I do believe that intelligence and criminal proclivities are largely determined genetically, I do not believe that in each case they are determined by a single gene, like the gene that determines eye color or lactose tolerance. I believe that in each case it is a constellation of genes that work in conjunction with each other, and which are also influenced by the environment.

I also believe that racial differences in average ability levels and behavior are primarily determined genetically, and reflect different population pressures lasting for hundreds and thousands of years. Agriculture and urban living select for different proclivities than hunting and gathering.

The differences overlap. There are whites who are mentally retarded. There are blacks who have genius level IQs. There are whites who spend most of their lives in and out of reform schools and prisons, and who cannot be rehabilitated. Most blacks never commit any felonies, or even misdemeanors.

 

You move the goalposts to keep your theory alive, you started this claim with a gene and disposition for crime and intelligence, it is only when you were challenged that you seem to add "mission creep" into your thesis, you dismissed out of hand the environmental issues and try to muddy the waters with saying that there are intelligent blacks and stupid whites. Does this apply to the Arabs also or are they just a lost cause to the power of your mighty jews.

And how is it you jump between "blacks" and "Negroes" when applying your criteria to them, is it so you can distinguish who is worthy and who isn't.

Also you prevaricate around an answer of what you and your kind will do if you ever discover these "lost" genes. Will it be internment camps and a dose of soma and a apostle from our Ford. Or do you have a whole new plan of eugenics for them.

 

Sorry!
I'll try not to swear at the cunt anymore

 

Chunky said Diedre79 was a guy and you said you would believe Chunky.
You lied, DL!

 

You are a scared Liberal bigot and a perfect target for a "NEGRO" to rob!

 

You haven't proved your assertion, bitch!

Your assertion, given the fact that the Vietnam War has been OVER since 1975, doesn't mean shit!

 

So why are you scared of all black people, you whining little bitch?

 

so how is this got anything to do with obamas vision for afghanistan again?