Viewing last 25 versions of comment by LemonDrop on image #3024337

[@Cosmicscribbles](/images/3024337#comment_10371908)
That may not be wrong but that's also an apt description for the majority of human artists, so it's not a very effective criticism of AI unless you think you're stealing other people's art by drawing inspiration and learning from things you see on Derpibooru.

You need to actually explain why in your mind a human is allowed to look through a gallery of public-facing images and learn to create art based on study of this information and practice whereas an AI is not allowed to do such a thing, otherwise this argument does not make sense.

Furthermore you have not explained why you think you're allowed to commit trademark infringement against Hasbro by drawing trademarked characters from MLP, this is not even fair use and something they can sue you for, but apparently you're fine with this direct exploitation of their work too for some unexplained reason. Note I am not defending copyright law here, I think it is a bad idea, but this sort of trademark infringement is far more of something you could equate to theft than pretty much fair use usage of images to train an AI, so I am not sure why you think it is acceptable given your heavy support of IP rights.

[@Cosmicscribbles](/images/3024337#comment_10371908)
That may not be wrong but that's also an apt description for the majority of human artists, so it's not a very effective criticism of AI unless you think you're stealing other people's art by drawing inspiration and learning from things you see on Derpibooru.

You need to actually explain why in your mind a human is allowed to look through a gallery of public-facing images and learn to create art based on study of this information and practice whereas an AI is not allowed to do such a thing, otherwise this argument does not make sense.

Furthermore you have not explained why you think you're allowed to commit trademark infringement against Hasbro by drawing trademarked characters from MLP, this is not even fair use and is illegal and something they can sue you for, but apparently you're fine with this direct thefxploitation of their work too for some unexplained reason. Note I am not defending copyright law here, I think it is a bad idea, but this sort of trademark infringement is far more of something you could equate to theft than pretty much fair use usage of images to train an AI.

[@Cosmicscribbles](/images/3024337#comment_10371908)
That may not be wrong but that's also an apt description for the majority of human artists, so it's not a very effective criticism of AI unless you think you're stealing other people's art by drawing inspiration and learning from things you see on Derpibooru.

You need to actually explain why in your mind a human is allowed to look through a gallery of public-facing images and learn to create art based on study of this information and practice whereas an AI is not allowed to do such a thing, otherwise this argument does not make sense.

Furthermore you have not explained why you think you're allowed to commit trademark infringement against Hasbro by drawing trademarked characters from MLP, this is not even fair use and is illegal and something they can sue you for, but apparently you're fine with this direct theft of their work too for some unexplained reason.

[@Cosmicscribbles](/images/3024337#comment_10371908)
That may not be wrong but that's also an apt description for the majority of human artists, so it's not a very effective criticism of AI unless you think you're stealing other people's art by drawing inspiration and learning from things you see on Derpibooru.

You need to actually explain why in your mind a human is abllowed to look through a gallery of public-facing images and learn to create art based on study of this information and practice whereas an AI is not allowed to do such a thing, otherwise this argument does not make sense.

[@Cosmicscribbles](/images/3024337#comment_10371908)
That may not be wrong but that's also an apt description for the majority of human artists, so it's not a very effective criticism of AI unless you think you're stealing other people's art by drawing inspiration and learning from things you see on Derpibooru.

You need to actually explain why a human is able to look through a gallery of public-facing images and learn to create art based on study of this information and practice whereas an AI is not allowed to do such a thing, otherwise this argument does not make sense.

[@Cosmicscribbles](/images/3024337#comment_10371908)
That may not be wrong but that's also an apt description for the majority of human artists, so it's not a very effective criticism of AI unless you think you're stealing other people's art by drawing inspiration and learning from things you see on Derpibooru.

You need to actually explain why a human is able to look through a gallery of public-facing images and learn to create art based on study and practice where an AI is not allowed to do such a thing, otherwise this argument does not make sense.

[@Cosmicscribbles](/images/3024337#comment_10371908)
That may not be wrong but that's also an apt description for the majority of human artists, so it's not a very effective criticism of AI unless you think you're stealing other people's art by drawing inspiration and learning from things you see on Derpibooru.