Even for you this is a new low. I suppose, if Clinton had been in the White House on 9/11 you'd say some stupid thing like;

"Mistakes were made. People were killed. Bleep happens. Get over it. "

The reality is, America was attacked; it was a terrorist attack; and the Obama Administration got it wrong. I've seen your posts about Bush sitting in the classroom when he learned of 9/11. "Deer in the headlights" is what I recall your post going on about.

So, lets talk about left wingnuts looking for excuses to justify their deranged defense of Obama.

Or, we can talk about logic and facts and not looking like a hypocrite.

Your choice.

 

Why was there not this much outrage when all those other embassies were attacked when Bush was in the White House. How come you guys didn't rush to trash Bush and his administrations actions. Well I have news for you all your crap is just that crap.
Here's real Benghazi time line....
*not_secure_link*www.nytimes.com/20...-defensive-role-in-libya-attack.html?hp&_r=1&

Basically you right wingers can shove your politically motivated false outrage up your ass.

 

You are too fucking much of an idiot, to give a response to,,but I will, straight from your god sent leftists media propaganda machine;

 

This close to Election Day, it’s getting harder to rank the liberal arguments on a scale of 1-10 (1 being sane and 10 being bonkers.) Perhaps they need the speakers from Spinal Tap to measure their level of lunacy.

​

 

McCain would have never been in that position. Your point is moot.

 

We liberals don't have to worry about the right wing arguments they are all 10-bonkers most if not all filled with hate, vitriol and outright lies.

 

Ah I see it only matters when Americans are killed by terrorists. Fuck the locals who help protect our embassies. You sir, and I use that term loosely, are a jackass.

I also note that you completely skipped the Benghazi issue now that your lies have been exposed for what they are.

 

Yeah sure, just like George the Lesser would have prevented 9/11.

 

Bush probably could have,,if Clinton had not relaxed the regulations.

 

NO,,,,dumb fuck,, it is not that simple, the Bush administration did not watch any of these attacks on real time T.V., nor did he tell those that wanted to help out,,to STAND DOWN,,nor did Bush relieve a General and an Admiral of their duty,,nor did Bush claim that those attacks were due to a fucking film,,nor is Bush afraid to say the term ''TERRORIST'',,nor did Bush place the PRODUCER of that supposed film in federal prison until AFTER the election,,that is nothing more than a ''POLITICAL PRISONER''..

If you fucking looney screaming moonbats want to give Obama the praise and credit for ''GIVING THE ORDER'' to kill Bin Ladin,,then we can sure as hell give all the credit to Obama, for telling those that wanted to jump into a fire fight to ''STAND DOWN''

When something else comes to fruition,,I'LL ASSURE YOU,,,I will post it.

 

Well liar your going to have to prove this one with an actual article link and I'm not talking your usual right wing liars media, use some organization with some integrity.

Well then you finally admit you've been spewing the right wing media lies all this time about the attack in Benghazi.

 

Then there's this report from NPR that once again proves you Ace are a liar and a repeater of lies....

*not_secure_link*www.npr.org/blogs/...u-s-offers-new-details-of-deadly-libya-attack

 

SpongeBoB: HAHAHAHAHHAA!! Patrick!!! you can't be a fry cook!

Patrick: Yeah?!?!?! Why not???

SpongeBob: Because you have no spatula.

Patrick: Anyone can flip a spatula . . .

(this is just as useful as any political discourse)

Plankton: GIVE ME THE FORMULA!!!

Crabs: I itch.

 

That link only proves how incompetent and shortsighted the Obama administration really is.

His failure to act is one thing. However, his lies and distortion of the truth is inexcusable. The lies were changing on a daily basis. Obama has still not taken responsibility and has only seen fit to cast blame on others for what happen that day.

 

Barack Obama is running out of apologists out in the world.

Someone ought to clue him in that he still has a few faithful here at XNXX. He could lurk here in the wee hours and get all the sympathy hugs he need. Might help him to sleep at night.

He's gonna need it.

Double-column full-length editorial on Benghazi in the Wall St. Journal today. SpJames, Kimiko and Stumbler will not read it, of course, but it does clearly explain why Benghazi is different from "all those other attacks," whatever they are; and why the story is not just "politicizing" by the Republicans; and why the story is even bigger than Cindy Sheehan (who was covered by the mainstream press daily for years), and even bigger than Valerie Plame (which was covered daily for at least a year), and even bigger than Abu Ghairab (which was covered daily for years), and bigger than Big Bird (which has been covered daily for months), and bigger than the War on Women (which was covered daily for months and is entirely fictional), and on, and on, and on.


Yep, Barry Hussein really ought to lurk here. This just might be the last place on earth where he can find absolute, total adoration, uncluttered by any thought, whatsoever.

 

error

dupe

 

This surprises you?
It's what Obama and his minions have done from the start; Blame Republicans, Bush, the 1%; anyone and anything but take responsibility and do something meaningful about it.

Meanwhile, keep saying it loud enough and long enough and people will start to believe it, and worse, believe it is a good thing;

Example; how many times has Obama taken credit for our "growing economy", and in recent weeks, the "Improved employment outlook" as if 7.8% unemployment is a good thing........

Oh, and DL; pull up your socks please

 

Whoa!!!!

SpJames is DL's sock?

SpJames is a 'he'?

And all this time we thought SpJames was a girlygirl! We thought she was Kimiko's sock!

Sheesh.

Well, even precious princesses are wont to err.

 

Ah Ms. Mealy mouth liar has arrived at last. The Republican war on women is real despite your deluded fantasies. Just type the search terms 'rape republican' into google and see what you get. Or try 'contraception republican' or 'abortion republican' or 'women's health republican' read some of the articles presented then come back and tell me there is no republican war on women and women's rights.

 

Tell me why I would want to trust an EDITORIAL which is nothing more than a News Corp anti Obama rant. The Wall Street Journal is becoming nothing more than a Fox News printed edition in other words completely un-trustable source for news.