Uploaded by apegacine
612x792 JPG 73 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2272258 +-SH artist:hattonslayden214 +-SH rarity226190 +-SH dark eldar23 +-SH anthro383908 +-SH unguligrade anthro68970 +-SH g42131025 +-SH armor33119 +-SH belly button118954 +-SH breasts416978 +-SH chainmail bikini102 +-SH dual wield435 +-SH female1914414 +-SH invulnerable save10 +-SH lelith hesperax6 +-SH mare809415 +-SH sexy49811 +-SH sinfully sexy712 +-SH solo1509177 +-SH stupid sexy rarity2583 +-SH sword15524 +-SH unconvincing armor1547 +-SH warhammer (game)2535 +-SH warhammer 40k2430 +-SH weapon43615 +-SH wide hips33673
Loading...
Loading...
But why?
Same here, I also have a thing for asymmetrical armor, I like it some ways but not others, like have the armor symmetrical shape but then hove something like one arm all red when the rest is black or something, or like with Nightmare in SC, but if it’s something small that you have to take a close look at to see then I hate it.
Oh well.
I kinda sorta agree with you. I don’t mind seeing a little titillation, but I’d prefer if the armor was more practical.
But there are people who will have none of it. Practical armor or GTFO.
Less metal covering lady skin = More protection.
…
I fucking love these kind of drawings.
I think it’s the stronger the female, the less armor she has to wear.
Or maybe it’s a gender passive that causes your armor rating to be determined by your total sexy attribute.
Nice artwork btw, but one of these days I’m going to draw a female wearing some practical, non-sexualizing armor :V