Policy Update - Rules changes incoming for AI content - Read Here
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Sky Railroad Merch Shop!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

suggestive197649 artist:fatcakes545 nurse redheart4623 anthro383984 unguligrade anthro68982 g42131326 absurd resolution69729 armpits47742 bed63328 bedroom eyes87673 blushing296850 bondage49344 bra23217 breasts417069 busty nurse redheart598 choker24105 chromatic aberration2240 clothes681380 female1914922 frilly underwear5085 garter belt14967 lingerie14859 looking at you284111 negligee147 panties67460 red underwear1589 ribbon9592 rose petals354 solo1509527 solo female248556 stockings53367 stupid sexy nurse redheart107 thigh highs80315 underwear83541

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

Liggliluff
Best Artist - Providing quality, Derpibooru-exclusive artwork
Helpful Owl - Drew someone's OC for the 2018 Community Collab
Friendship, Art, and Magic (2018) - Celebrated Derpibooru's six year anniversary with friends.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
An Artist Who Rocks - 100+ images under their artist tag
Artist -

@Savvy  
Yes, you’ll have to do it intentionally to get the effect. But this image has a very minor effect.  
Using my *chromatic aberration calculator, it gives the effect of 0.62, and shouldn’t really be visible when zoomed out.
 
>>964411 this image has 3.48 and should be much more visible.
 
I’m not a fan of the effect either, and it does take up more storage as it can’t be compressed as effectively. So I wouldn’t mind if people would stop using it.
Savvy
Non-Fungible Trixie -

What the fuck is wrong with this image? Chromatic abberation to the max! Zooming in actually makes my eyes hurt. Do people do this intentionally?!