Uploaded by Slirtson
751x466 PNG 221 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
I can’t say I fully support Trump, but I loved his response.
Tags
+-SH safe2276510 +-SH edit181757 +-SH edited screencap96104 +-SH screencap303337 +-SH princess luna120877 +-SH g42118980 +-SH luna eclipsed1968 +-SH my little pony: friendship is magic268789 +-SH 1000 hours in ms paint7485 +-SH caption26838 +-SH donald trump335 +-SH meta18885 +-SH ms paint7582 +-SH politics1957 +-SH republican52 +-SH text98023 +-SH the fun has been doubled230 +-SH the wall103
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
Shhh,simple solution for simple people
Shhh,no dreams no ,only populism
>he hasn’t heard about the “expedited process”
Y’know what? I don’t want to be the one to spoil the illusion. It’s like telling a kid there’s no Santa.
Question: Do you know the required traits of facism? Do you know the things that cannot co-exist with facism?
Of course not. You through out that bullshit claim because the shocking idea of ENFORCING AN ENTIRELY RATIONAL LAW is apparently facist.
Oh, and no. Cruz did not oppose it for being “too soft.” He’s on record as trying to equate going out and arresting people for breaking an entirely rational law as too much like 1984. He then went on to say that he supported biometric scans for all those entering the country and a national registry of all citizens. Because that’s completely unlike 1984.
Also, I can only guess as to the origin of the “for five seconds” claim, but my guess is that Donald Trump supports legal immigration, including of those that previously immigrated illegally. Why this would be such a terrible thing, I don’t know. If they’re willing to go through the process of immigrating legally, fine. And it keeps out the criminals, so… what’s the problem, again?
You’re right. I forgot The Donald’s equally impractical “deport them all… for five seconds” policy. My bad.
(Which Cruz opposes for being too soft on the immig’ants. It’s a testament to Trump’s salesmanship that he can spin so-called “touchback amnesty” as a hardline stance. But that’s the story of his campaign: a moderate appealing to conservatives with damn near fascist rhetoric. It’s fascinating in its own way, and a little bit horrifying–even if he’s not the would-be dictator so many on the left are afraid of, he’s proven that there’s a market for one. Ironically, that may be a reason to vote for him. ’Cause if Hillary wins, God knows who the right will turn to after four more years in the wilderness.)
He has. Ted Cruz is on the record as saying that he opposes Trump’s plan other than the wall. Basically, the wall is what Trump actually does share in common with Cruz.
Try paying a little more attention to politics before talking about it. Headlines don’t give you much information.
@NonsensicalBrony
I gotta say: I’m a big fan of anyone that make an entire post of sarcasm. Keep at it. ;)
If the man has a comprehensive plan for border security, and apparently he does, maybe he shouldn’t be focusing so much on the most expensive and least effective part of it. But of course he has to, because it’s the only part where he differs from the rest of the GOP field. Even the guy who was pushing a path to citizenship a few years back is all about E-Verify and the Border Patrol these days.
(Hell, Cruz and Rubio have both proposed border fences of their own. They just wouldn’t spend billions of dollars on making their walls especially CLASSY and LUXURIOUS.)
Ah I see. In that case let’s let in millions of undocumented illegals then care for them with our tax dollars because #freeshit lmao
What, that illegal immigrant that easily hopped the border was a serial child rapist and crossed the border to escape the jurisdiction of his government? It’s okay there are no papers to prove it so we’ll pay him in peanuts to pick our strawberries and further monopolize the agriculture industry.
And if we do find out about his past, should we deport him? Naaah, let’s lock him up in our own prison system and give him 3 meals a day, education, and medical & dental benefits :^)
Basically what’s happening here is that Background Human is ignoring the mass flood of people that come across our border out in the open (usually carrying drugs). Either that or he’s relying on the argument that, since the wall itself (minus the other policies) doesn’t fix all the problems, then it shouldn’t happen as part of the multi-step solution.
Because logic.
Don’t need penetration for home defense :^)
It’s better if the bullet fragments inside the target, better chance to kill.
Okay, I’m not exactly a “Second Amendment enthusiast,” so forgive my ignorance here, but how much penetration are those machine guns capable of? Can they shoot through 30+ feet (10m) of dirt and rock?
And can they be supplemented by expired-visa-seeking missiles?
Just add machine gun nests.
>Implying that keeping illegals out will help solve America’s woes
Shit, I should really read the comments before giving my two shekels :^)
Islamic extremists posing as refugees infiltrate and exploit the socialist democracy of Canada
“HAHA, THE WALL HAS BEEN DOUBLED!”
@LordDusk2014
It was two former presidents, actually. You know, the corrupt liars that drove their country into the ground via socialism?