AH!
Shooter stands corrected.

You figured out that Japanese crime rate thing yet?

 

He can't because he would have to admit the violence is caused by the culture of the areas not the race of the occupants.

 

What is ";j t qt" supposed to be? You need to fix your spelling before you accuse others of being idiots.

 

It takes intelligence to carry out a mass murder of the scope of the Holocaust.

Everyone who participated in the Holocaust deserved to be hanged. Many were hanged. Nevertheless, right now Germans are much safer to live with than are Negroes.

 

Somehow I doubt that it takes much IQ to just pull a trigger and blaze away. I'm beginning to agree with Hellcat and Shootersa about you.

 

The different races differ significantly in average ability levels and behavior. These differences are due to different evolutionary pressures lasting for hundreds and thousands of years. Anyone who has had extensive contact with more than one race knows that what I say is true. Hellcat and Shootersa know that I am right on this matter. They are too hypocritical to acknowledge it.

For too long there have been too many sanctions and taboos against discussing this matter dispassionately.

In the United States liberals have called for "a dialogue on race." Unfortunately, they have suppressed an honest dialogue. They want diversity of races, but not diversity of opinions about races. It has become somewhat dangerous to state facts that are not in serious dispute, or at least to draw rational conclusions from those facts.

 

For the record I agree that there is higher rates of violent crime from blacks and Hispanics but I disagree about the cause. I know many Hispanics from both rural and urban areas and have seen the difference in their cultures and crime rates. These differences also apply to blacks as well. This is a factor that isn't in any of your figures.

 

You really are sounding more like the Ku Klux Klan to me. So get lost.

 

Culture and race go hand in hand.

 

In rural areas, there is no racial disparity in murder.
*not_secure_link*www.columbia.edu/~rs328/Homicide.pdf

Hispanics and Negroes are more suited by evolution for rural than urban life.

Hispanics are a hybrid race composed of Europeans, American Indians, and some Negroes. American Indians living in what is now Latin America began agriculture about five thousand years ago. The ancestors of American Negroes began to adopt agriculture about four thousand years ago.

American Indians in what is now Mexico and Central America began civilization about 2,800 years ago. The ancestors of American Negroes never developed civilizations with cities, and systems of mathematics and writing like American Indians in what is now Latin America did.

In the United States Hispanics have a lower crime rate than Negroes, but a higher crime rate than whites.

 

They do not people of the same race can have different cultures. Take the Middle East.for example. You look at Arabs that have moved out of the region and have changed their culture you don't get the radical beliefs that others have. The same is true with blacks and Hispanics when you look at the differences between rural and urban areas and the rates of violent crime.

 

I've been all over the world. I stand by my statement.

 

Again you fail to see the differences in the cultures of rural and urban. In rural life both parents take a active part in the child's life. There isn't the popular culture influence towards crime like in urban areas. The child is taught about family and hard work in rural life instead of the lessons of gang life in urban areas.

 

At one time the govt. did a study and released the results. The study was about the intelligence of different races. The bottom line of the study said intelligence and years of civilization were related. When the results were released the NAACP immediately went to court to block the study.

It is really easy to understand how civilization and intelligence would be related. Before a race of people become civilized there isn't much they have to learn. All that is needed is the basic animal instincts. As a race becomes civilized intelligence becomes more important. It is about the same as comparing a 6 year old kid to a 35 year old adult. Not everyone fits but the average is what we are looking at.

 

My unsolicited opinion.

Magic4589, I think some of them are kind of brain dead, just like some of the democrats.

I personally believe that firearms are important. I believe that it is the only tool that allows a 105 pound teenage girl, an 80 year old veteran with a walker, and a 23 year old MMA fighter to stand on equal ground. Well, maybe not equal ground, but as close as you can get with that variety.

I don't want "bad guys" to have guns any more than the next guy, but I believe that it is more important to allow a wheelchair bound man the means to defend the life of his granddaughter. I believe that the answer to a mass shooting isn't the tightening of gun laws, but an armed response, be it from the police or an armed and responsible citizen.

And that's what makes our country unique. Our freedom to own guns isn't about hunting or self defense from a "bad guy." Those are important things, but when our constitution was written, those were kind of a given. Putting them into the bill of rights would have been akin to adding an amendment that allowed people to live in houses, and not caves: people would have said "well duh!"

There is a scene in Mark Twain's The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn where a posse attempts to lynch a man, and he stands on his roof with a rifle, and tells them to go fuck themselves. In America, you have the right to be gay, straight, into BDSM, white, black, republican, democrat, listen to Justin Beiber or Led Zeppelin, and everything in between, and you have the right to defend that.

Think about that for a second. If a group of men decide to burn a cross in front of your house, then burn your house, you have the right to say "No fucking way" and defend yourself and your family. It doesn't matter if the posse outside are wearing white hoods, or an issued military uniform.

And that is our biggest fear. That some man from "the gubment" will show up and tell us how to live our lives and exercise our freedoms. That the standing political powers that be will take our land, our homes, our way of life, and shove something entirely unappealing down our throat.

For better or for worse, its happened before. It started with the British trying to tax the colonies, then we had the Civil War, which is a whole separate argument. Probably the best example is what happened during World War 2: President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in the aftermath of Pearl Harbor, decided to round up all the Japanese Americans, take them from their homes, and put them in concentration camps. I firmly believe that evil exists in this world, and I also believe that what happened under that presidency was an act of evil. I think every single one of those fathers would have been within their God given rights (the constitution is pretty clear: only the Almighty gives us rights, governments are erected to safeguard those rights, not grant them) to draw a line in the sand, and say "No. You are not taking my family to prison."

So in short, we don't really trust our government, and yes there are rules that the powers that be have to play by, but if they ever, like FDR, decide to shred the rulebook and appoint themselves "above the law" then that rifle in granddads closet may be the only way to remind them that we won't play the game that way.

 

Many studies have been made on the average intelligence of different races. They all come up with the same results. Ashkenazi Jews are the most intelligent with an average IQ estimated at 110-115. The people of China, Korea, and Japan - whom I call "Orientals" - come in second with an average of 106. White Gentiles of European ancestry come in third with an average of 100. Non Oriental Mongoloids and non European Caucasians average about 85. American Negroes average 85 too. African Negroes average 70. The Pygmies of central Africa, the Bushmen of southern Africa, and the Australian Aborigines average about 60.

Although there are many taboos and sanctions against propagating this information, the information is not in doubt.

Racial differences in average intelligence have a durability that requires an unbiased person to recognize genetic causation. These differences also have legitimate policy implications. Those who find the policy implications irksome try to suppress evidence that the differences exist.

 

Exactly! The Bill of Rights (The first ten amendments) was written with the express purpose of protecting the citizens from government, which invalidates the argument like "the 2nd Amendment was written when muskets were the most sophisticated weapon".

In Lord Overbama's recent State of the Union speech, he pretty much told the nation that, if he couldn't get his own way with Congress, he'd simply go around them. "I have a pen and a phone." In essence, "I don't need no steenkin' Constitution." And Congressional Democrats stood and applauded that statement! Are you fucking kidding me? But long before then, it was quite clear he considers our Constitution (as well as Congress) a hindrance to his agenda.

"[FONT=arial,verdana,helvetica]I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."[/FONT]

That means all laws. Not just the ones that work to his advantage. He never misses a chance to scold House Republicans for votes aimed at repealing or changing Obamacare. And in case you haven't been paying attention, what THEY did was follow the process for laws and changes to them. THEY, along with the rest of Congress, are the ones who MAKE law. Yes, Yet, Obama has rewritten his own health care law a couple of dozen times now. He's a perfect example of why the Constitution created checks and balances.

So, whatever someone's opinion of Tea Party Republicans, the biggest thing you need to consider is this. They were elected by the voters. The very voters who saw what was happening during Obama's first two years, along with his Democrat-controlled Congress, and sent him a message. But Obama ignored that message. And guess what. Chances are good he'll be getting a similar message in November, as speculation is high that, not only will Republicans keep control of the US House, but earn (again, from the voters), control of the Senate as well. Will Obama get the message then? Doubtful.

Now, before you go labeling me as some racist (I've sucked more black cock than many people have shaken black hands), Tea Party Repug (if you haven't already), I'll have you know that I was a registered Democrat for 30 years (from the day I turned 18, until September of 2010). I even voted for Obama in 2008. After a year and half of watching him and the Democrat-controlled Congress act in ways that shocked the hell out of ME, one of the very people who helped put them in power, I came to believe they were working for the good of themselves, and not the country. They had an agenda to achieve, and didn't care if they spent the country into oblivion to achieve it. I changed my voter registration to "Unaffiliated", as in "beholden to none". As Ronald Reagan once said, "I didn't leave the Democratic party. They left me."

So yes, I did vote for Obama, but like that famous line from Johnny Dangerously...

 

You mean there is something wrong with public sector teachers?
They went though the state-authorized education system after all...
:excited:

 

Lets settle a couple of items here and now.
1) I do not believe you are right, quite the opposite; your unwillingness or inability to have a meaningful discussion about violence segregated by racial lines, and your repeated attempts to foil discussion with your cherry picked facts convinces me that you have your head so far up the bell curve thingy that you are incapable of ever looking at real facts that refute your core beliefs.
2) The only taboo about discussing race around here is your own; and you are very predictable. You run in, spout your
NIGGERS IS VIOLENT AND STUPID
crap, and then run off.

And since when have you spouted relevant facts not in dispute?
And rational conclusions? HA!

 

Proving yet again, intelligence, or rather the lack thereof, is not a predictor of violence.

Lets consider; the hundreds of thousands of intelligent Germans, kind and gentle folk, follow a small cadre of mad men into the deepest pit of hell. They blindly follow the teachings of these mad men, agreeing that
JEWS ARE VIOLENT AND STUPID
and proceed to murder a few million of them.

Now how come the Bell curve thingy never addressed that inconvenient set of facts?

HMMM??