Policy Update - Rules changes incoming for AI content - Read Here
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Champions of Equestria

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

Sorry if this picture is nightmare fuel.

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

AaronMk
Celestial Glory - Helped others get their OC into the 2024 Derpibooru Collab.
Nightmare in the Moon - Had their OC in the 2024 Derpibooru Collab.
Lunar Supporter - Helped forge New Lunar Republic's freedom in the face of the Solar Empire's oppressive tyrannical regime (April Fools 2023).
Flower Trio - Helped others get their OC into the 2023 Derpibooru Collab.
Crystal Roseluck - Had their OC in the 2023 Derpibooru Collab.
Tree of Harmony - Drew someone's OC for the 2022 Community Collab
Elements of Harmony - Had an OC in the 2022 Community Collab
Non-Fungible Trixie -
Verified Pegasus - Show us your gorgeous wings!
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~

Sky funeral
@FillerArtist
 
I think at a lower-poly level, where a more outdated quality would be expected, that wouldn’t look bad. What kills it are the dead-eyes, robotic or not. You could probably circumvent this by making the iris like an aperture as opposed to trying to look natural.
 
But if it were the Scootaballoon here then yea, whatever.
FillerArtist
A Really Classy Artist - 250+ images under their artist tag
An Artist Who Rocks - 100+ images under their artist tag
Artist -

I make stuff, I think.
@Sky_Wolf
 
Here’s my old Feather-Bot model I have (Which had a-lot of downvotes last time I posted it) with retrofitted bones to perform the same animation. It’s the only higher-poly model I currently have.
 
full
Sky_Wolf
Duck - Quack!

@Nightweaver20xx  
TBH, I think it is in the sweet spot right now. It isn’t too modern to be compromised by simplistic model and yet isn’t too pixelated to look bad. I think he should just leave it as it is right now or make both versions just out of interest to see which one would look best with the current level of detail.
Sky_Wolf
Duck - Quack!

@FillerArtist  
I’m not sure if that would help much as I was referencing mostly the simplistic style of the model itself rather than its polygon count… As of now, it looks as something you would see in simple indie games or handheld consoles/devices. And yes, you can try increasing polygon number to see how it looks… I doubt it would make it worse, so why not? :)